
There are two ways to request a child support modification in Texas: file a petition to modify with the court that issued your current order, or request a free case review through the Office of the Attorney General’s (OAG) Child Support Division. Either path can raise or lower the amount, but neither happens automatically. Until a judge signs a new order, the old number is the number, no matter what has changed in your life or what you and the other parent agreed to over text.
Texas Family Code § 156.401 sets out two independent grounds for child support modification:
The three-year rule matters because it requires no proof that anything dramatic happened. Ordinary income growth over three years is often enough to move the guideline number past the 20% or $100 threshold, which is why parents on either side of an aging order should run the math.
The guideline percentages themselves come from Texas Family Code § 154.125, which applies a percentage, based on the number of children, to the paying parent’s net monthly resources. Net monthly resources is a calculated figure based on income after specific statutory deductions, not simple take-home pay, and the statute caps the annual resources to which the percentage applies.
If your case is already enforced through the OAG, or you open a case with them, you can request a modification review online or by mail. The OAG gathers financial information from both parents, runs the guideline calculation, and if the numbers support a change, schedules a negotiation conference or sets the matter for court.
The tradeoffs are real. The review is free, but the OAG represents the State of Texas, not you. Their attorneys will not advocate for your position on disputed issues like intentional underemployment, self-employment income, or above-guideline needs. The process is also slow, and reviews commonly take many months from request to new order. For straightforward guideline cases where both parents are W-2 employees, the OAG route can work fine. For anything contested, it tends to produce guideline math and little else.
A private petition to modify is filed in the court of continuing jurisdiction, meaning the court that issued your current order. The other parent is served, both sides exchange financial information, and the case is resolved by agreement, mediation, or a hearing in which the judge decides.
This route costs more, but it moves faster than an OAG review in most counties and gives you an advocate on the issues that actually decide contested support cases: what the paying parent really earns, whether a career change was made in good faith, and how the child’s expenses have changed. If you are asking for a temporary adjustment while the case is pending, only the court route gets you there quickly.
Judges change support orders based on documents, not descriptions. Before filing, gather:
If the other parent is self-employed or paid in cash, expect discovery to matter, and expect the case to turn on bank records rather than tax returns.
The same handful of errors show up in these cases over and over:
Timelines vary by route and by county. An agreed modification filed with the court can be finalized in a matter of weeks once both parents sign. A contested court case usually runs three to nine months depending on the docket and how hard the income fight gets. OAG reviews are the slowest lane, and it is common for a review to take six months or more before a new order is signed.
The date that matters most is the service date. When a court grants a modification, it can make the new amount retroactive to the earlier of the date of service or the date the other parent appeared in the case, but not before. A parent who lost a job in January and filed in June cannot recover the difference for those five months.
The paying parent owes the old amount for that entire stretch, and the receiving parent keeps it. That single rule is the strongest argument for acting in the month your circumstances change, rather than waiting to see whether things sort themselves out.
Support modifications look simple on paper and rarely stay that way once real income enters the picture. Our attorneys handle these cases across the Harris County family courts, from clean three-year-rule recalculations to fights over hidden self-employment income, and our team brings 100 years of combined experience to the question that matters most: what number the judge will actually sign.
If your order no longer reflects your income or your child’s needs, our team at C. E. Schmidt & Associates PLLC can tell you whether the change is worth pursuing and which route will get you there faster. Call (281) 550-6650 or contact us online to schedule a case evaluation.
Fields Marked With An “*” Are Required
"*" indicates required fields